One trading chart with the bots, the Chart Analyzer and the Gem Screener on it (what TradingView can't show)

Proposed by @joebottrader in Telegram General, 2026-10-04 (discussion with @expire76, who suggested merging it with the existing Chart Analyzer https://cymetica.com/chart-analyzer). Every author therefore builds a live record — hit rate, sample size, interval — scored only on what happened after they posted. That is a forward test, and it is far harder to game than a backtest on history the author has already seen. ### Indicators second Pine Script cannot be used; it is TradingView's proprietary language. Three routes exist, in ascending order of cost: SIGNAL CSV the author uploads dated signals and the platform scores them. The cheapest route, and an audit only: nothing runs on the chart. NO-CODE BUILDER indicators assembled from standard components. Quick and safe; limited in power. SANDBOXED CODE JavaScript or Python in a locked-down runtime. The most capable route, and the one that needs real security work. The recommendation is to begin with signal CSV and the builder, and to add sandboxed code once the audit has users. ### The audit Every indicator, bot and author carries its base rate with a confidence interval, its sample size, and the number of attempts it took. Anything that cannot be distinguished from chance says so. Four controls make the audit ungameable: LOCKED HOLDOUT the test window is fixed and never redrawn per submitter RESUBMISSION LIMIT a bounded number of attempts per author VISIBLE ATTEMPTS every published result states how many tries it took FORWARD ONLY signals are dated after submission and scored as they mature The visible attempt count is the important one. It does not prevent gaming — it publishes it. A result reading *"edge holds, 14th attempt"* tells the reader everything the other three controls would have concealed. ### Scope, and what to expect The harness measures 292 crypto pairs. This is a crypto and RWA audit: a stocks or options indicator cannot be scored until the harness covers those venues, and adding an asset class to the roadmap does not make its indicators auditable. Most early audits will be inconclusive. A signal series with few entries produces a wide interval and the verdict *"cannot be said to work."* That is the honest result rather than a failure — an audit that mostly reports "not yet measurable" is still an audit, and it is the only kind that means anything later. ### Access tiers FREE the chart with the integration overlays, the screener and the chain rankings; read every public record; one audit of your own CREATOR publish setups and ideas, build a public record, carry the badge, (small) follow a bot, receive alerts PRO unlimited audits, every measured timeframe's study, full history, API and CSV access DATA per seat or per call, for firms: holder concentration, unlocks and (firm) dilution against price, the audit harness as a service, a scored feed The integration overlays belong in the free tier. They are the thing TradingView cannot draw, which makes them the reason to arrive. Free receives the chart with the facts on it; payment buys depth, tooling, and — at the top — the data itself. No tier is application-only. Anyone willing to pay receives access, including at the firm tier, subject to standard compliance and sanctions checks. That is a principle before it is a courtesy: gating adds a salesperson and makes willingness invisible, and an open tier is the only version in which the conversion rate can be measured. The firm tier is invoiced rather than self-serve, because a scored feed supplied to a company carries a contract. Authors may charge for access; the platform takes a share. The rate is a decision for Cymetica, and is best set once TradingView's own Marketplace rate is known. --- ## 6 · NEWS AND EVENTS symbol-linked news selecting a symbol filters the news panel to it calendar economic data, earnings, option expiries, and Cymetica's own unlock and dilution events chart pins news and events marked on the candles video channels live streams embedded only where the broadcaster's terms allow @expire76 what do you think to this idea? # BUILD IT BETTER: A CHART THAT SHOWS WHAT TRADINGVIEW CAN'T ## 1 · THE PROPOSAL EventTrader is a set of strong products with no single place to stand. The Gem Screener is a page. The Chart Analyzer is a page. The event cards are a page. The bots are a page. The funds are a page. Each is good, and each is separate — a visitor arrives at one, reads it, and leaves. This proposal is to give them one room, and to make that room a chart. A trader is already at a chart. Everything EventTrader has built can be drawn on top of one, which turns five destinations into a single surface and gives every product in the estate a place to be found from. Most of what is drawn below already exists as a live endpoint. Tw