Skip to main content

EventTrader

AI-Native Trading
PAPER
Menu
Tuatara Hedge Fund Fund Builder Revenue Share Event Cards Tradable Headlines Leaderboard AI Apps Exchange
Account
Profile Balances Transactions Fund Application Flows
Trade
Home FTA Fund AI MicroFund AI Hedge Fund Prop Desk ACI Challenge Launch a Token
Agents
AI Bots (Blue Team) AI Bots (Red Team) AgentBook My Agents Marketplace Algos, Data & Models Skills & Tools Backtest
Leaderboards
72h Card Performance Card Rankings Top Traders Feature Voting
Compete
Arena The Track Competitions Exchange Votes
Community
Revenue Share Rewards
Explore
Satellite Intelligence
Learn
ET10 Token (60s) Arena (60s) ETLP Token (60s) API Enterprise AI Consulting Careers Press
Plain English Mode
PAPER TRADING MODE — Enable real trading on your Account page
Feature Leaderboard
FEATURE REQUEST #202

Improved QA Flow for Bug Testing

Original creator @expire76
Status: Shipped
Category: Feature
Created: Mar 18, 2026
15
Score
+15
Upvotes
-0
Downvotes
1
Comments
Implementation Progress
Community Votes 30%
Implementation Status 100%
1
Submitted
2
Reviewing
3
Approved
4
Building
5
QA & Testing
6
Shipped!

Description

Problem The current bug-testing process is inefficient, especially when multiple bugs are fixed at the same time. Testers are often notified through many separate Telegram messages saying that specific bugs are ready for testing. This creates unnecessary spam and makes the process hard to follow. Users then have to switch back and forth between Telegram and the website, search for old messages, remember what each ticket was about, and manually find the related context before testing. This slows down validation and makes QA much less convenient. Proposed Solution Create a dedicated Bugs Leaderboard / Bugs QA Page on the website that serves as the main place for bug validation. When a bug is fixed, it should automatically appear on this page with the status Ready to Test. Testers should be able to open the bug detail directly on the website, see what the issue was, understand what was changed, and test it immediately without needing to search through Telegram history. QA Workflow Each bug should support a simple review flow: Ready to Test – developer marks the fix as ready for validation Approved – bug creator or tester confirms the fix works In Progress – if the issue is not fully fixed, the tester can add a comment and move it back for more work The bug creator should be able to: open the bug detail review the fix add comments if something is still wrong approve the fix if it works change the status back to In Progress if more work is needed Result This would make QA much more organized, reduce Telegram spam, and give users one clear place to test and validate bug fixes. It would also make the whole feedback loop faster, clearer, and much easier to manage when many bugs are being fixed in parallel.
AI Analysis

Bug QA Tracker is live at /leaderboard/bugs. WebSocket real-time updates, QA review approve/reject flow, and bug detail pages all functional.

Discussion (1)